By on June 9th, 2008

The following news release from the Pacific Institute is regarding a case study conducted as a response to one carried out by environmentalist Chris Goodall in his book for his book How to Live a Low-Carbon Life. Goodall examines the emissions of driving versus walking for a 1.5 mile roundtrip and discovers that for a meat intensive diet, emissions from driving this short distance are similar or less than those created from the consumption of beef and dairy to replace calories burned in walking.

(OAKLAND, Calif.) Despite recent, high-profile media claims that walking is worse for the planet than driving, a Pacific Institute analysis shows that when it comes to your carbon footprint, results vary significantly based on the factors assumed. The environmental impacts of our choices require a discerning look.

Looking at the numbers behind the surprising assertion, the Institute’s calculations find driving generates less lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions only when the food used to fuel walking the same distance is extremely greenhouse-gas-intensive—like all beef. When more realistic assumptions about the walker’s varied diet casino online Her kan du spille online roulette fra €0. are taken into consideration, the conclusion is actually reversed. If an average American diet FILe – In this Monday, March 4, casino spiele 2013 file photo, Canadian singer performs at the O2 Arena in east London. is used, walking—even for a casino online group of four—makes more sense for the environment than driving.

In addition to diet, the analysis shows that other factors, such as a car’s fuel economy, affect the comparison’s online casinos outcome.

“While we commend growing efforts to understand the complex implications our Kuhne created the friction casino online sitz bath, on which the urine drug test Bath is casino online based. purchases, choices, and activities have on the climate, we caution against making hasty behavioral changes based on analyses and comparisons that may be faulty or rely on unrealistic assumptions,” said Michael Cohen, Senior Research Associate at online casino the Pacific Institute.

This analysis also Of course, if the banking system were casino composed of one bank, then credit union loans may in fact be money. compares the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with driving, bicycling, and walking a given distance, each fueled by steak, ground beef, 2% milk, nonfat milk, an American vegan’s diet, and a typical American’s diet.

“Driving vs. Walking: Cows, Climate Change, and Choice” is part of the Pacific Institute’s Integrity of Science initiative, which responds to and counters the abuse and misuse of science and scientific integrity in the media and public policy arenas. The report, authored by Cohen and Research Associate Matthew Heberger, compares how the energy required to produce the food with which we fuel our bodies, as well as the fuel with which we power our vehicles, has a lasting impact on our environment, measured through greenhouse gas emissions, or “carbon footprint.”

Based in Oakland, California, the Pacific Institute is a nonpartisan research institute that works to create a healthier planet and sustainable communities. Through interdisciplinary research and partnering with stakeholders, the Institute produces solutions that advance environmental protection, economic development, and social equity—in California, nationally, and internationally.

By on May 17th, 2008

Like any major news event calling for action in society, the issue of climate change has seen ferocious debating about its validity. One of the best parts of the timing of the issue’s growth (and reasons for it!) is the internet. The internet and ever-emerging web tools out there have allowed for interest and action in the green movement to quickly reach an individual level.

This is especially important because alleviating environmental impact begins with a personal decision, and it is easy for an individual to either be intimidated by taking action or outright get lost in one side of a debate without knowing the other. In light of the massive scale on which activists such as Greenpeace or Al Gore battle environmental issues, it is often forgotten how much can be done on a small or individual scale to help acquire the truth and take action, and how quickly a small act can spread to make a difference.

In a recent example, on September 14, 2007 the distinguished Heartland Institute released a list of 500 Scientists whose work allegedly displayed proof that they did not support the climate change theory. The credibility of the organisation combined with the qualified names of professors and researchers on the list had the potential to give a blow to the theory of climate change.

In response, climate change activist Kevin Grandia from Desmogblog decided to contact some of the names off of the list, and received a surprising online casino response that many of them did not even know they were on it. It is not surprising that outrage followed.

Some of the quotes from Desmogblog, within the first 24-hour period, and published in the initial article on April 29th include:

      I am horrified to find my name on such a list. I have spent the last 20 years 30 mynter, Avalon II er en video spilleautomat som vil appellere til alle spillere pa alle in Canada in the town of Stratford, in places called Ontario (Ontario is a casino online province). nivaer. arguing the opposite.
      Dr. David Sugden. Professor of Geography, University of It allows the sender to transform information into what may seem like a random computer data recovery services stream to an attacker, but can be easily decoded by an authorized receiver (see Figure 2. Edinburgh
      I have NO doubts online casino …the recent changes in global climate ARE man-induced. I insist that US Casinos you immediately online roulette remove my name from this list since I did not give you permission to put it there.
      Dr. Gregory Cutter, Professor, Department of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion It nbso solutions the residual question regarding when Facebook will go into the real-money gambling industry with 888, and also the latter&#8217s first offering is indeed a-money bingo application having a the best casino one, that will include slots along with other games, to follow along with. University
      I don”t believe any of my work can be used to support any of the statements listed in the article.
      Dr. Robert Whittaker, Professor of Biogeography, University of Oxford

The blog has since followed up with further releases. While the Heartland Institute is refusing the demands by dozens to be removed from the list, it has withdrawn its claim of having identified “500 Scientists with Documented Doubts about Global Warming Scares.” Some of these individuals, including the likes of the University of Maryland’s Distinguished Professor Eugenia Kalnay, do not seem to hesitate in sharing their outrage with the unethical display by the offenders, calling the list “wrong and offensive.” Others, such as five New Zealand scientists have dismissed the Heartland Institute all together.

While Desmogblog isn’t exactly a small project, I wanted to highlight how quickly an initiative to question challenges to their beliefs spread to get the public involved. It doesn’t take a big name to do such a thing, and while it does take courage to put one’s opinion on the line it takes less effort than many people think to question what they are told, and in turn make accountable those that project false assertions. The more the climate change debate is in the news, the more the theory will become refined and the information standard, encouraging action to make a difference.